Ex-PM Backs Nuclear Storage in Australia

Share On Stumble
bob hawke

Former Prime Minister Bob Hawke has given his public support to the development of Australia’s nuclear resources, as well as to the storage of related radioactive waste material.

While addressing at a Cooperative Research Centres Association Conference in Perth, former Prime Minister Bob Hawke said the development of nuclear power in Australia could bring both economic and environmental benefits.

“This is a case where in doing good for the rest of the world, we can, in the process, do enormously well for the Australian economy,” he said.

Hawke said nuclear power could play a critical role in reducing the impact of anthropogenic climate change and that Australia was in a position to make a major contribution to its global development given that it holds around 40 per cent of the world’s uranium deposits.

The former Labor leader added that Australia bore a responsibility to assist with the safe disposal of radioactive waste, given the ample space the country possesses.

“If Australia has – as we do – the safest remote locations for storing the world’s nuclear waste, we have a responsibility to make those sites available for this purpose,” he said.

Hawke based this conclusion on a 25-year old report made by Ralph Slayter, whom the former prime minister appointed as Australia’s first chief scientist back in 1989. According to Slayter’s report, some of the remote reaches of the Northern Territory and Western Australia could provide apt dumping grounds for radioactive waste.

“It would, of course, be entirely appropriate that before any action is take along the lines I am suggesting, another expert scientific investigation be undertaken to confirm the accuracy of the information,” Hawke said.

His  remarks arrive just as some of Australia’s largest developing neighbours, including India and China, step up the development of nuclear power in order to sate their surging burgeoning energy needs and reduce their dependence on fossil fuels which generate copious amounts of pollution.

Tony Roulstone, course director for nuclear energy at the University Cambridge, described China and South Korea’s pursuit of nuclear energy as “single-minded,” pointing out that both countries are building third-generation reactors with greater speed and fewer cost blowouts than industrialised countries in the West.

China in particular is pushing hard for the adoption of nuclear power domestically, as the use of coal-fired power plants results in hazardous smog levels in the country’s major cities, threatening to foment popular unrest.

CONTRIBUTED BY:


Marc Howe covers developments in the energy, mining and infrastructure sectors for Sourceable. He worked as a technical translator and business journalist in China throughout the noughties, but has since returned to Australia and is currently based in his hometown of Canberra....

SHARE

Share On Stumble

Comments

 characters available
  1. Grant Spork says:

    After Chernobl and Fukishima I thought most Australians would understand the implications for our reputation as a clean and healthy food supplier would be compromised by going for the "Nuclear Option." I think those who want to promote Nuclear should have the waste stream in their own back yards, literally. Let them sleep with a spent nuclear fuel rod and go for a swim or surf in front of the Fukishima reactor, and drink water from a rain tank outside the plant. When they have done that, we won't have to worry any more about the Nuclear lobby.


advertisement

More Engineering

Preventive Maintenance Programs Save in the Long Run

HVAC

With budgets tight and workers stretched thin, preventive maintenance... Buildings

Mining Bust ‘Hardly Begun’: BIS

loss

An anticipated slowdown in resource sector investment has barely... Business

Mergers and Acquisitions in the Built Environment

merger ahead

Despite the decline in the mining sector, Mergers and... Business

advertisement