Are Visa Restrictions Imperilling Infrastructure Growth? 2

By
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014
liked this article
Embed
Siemens – 300×250 (Expires October 31st 2017)
advertisement
457 visa
FavoriteLoadingsave article

One of Australia’s leading industry bodies warns that the country’s current visa regime could hamper infrastructure development by depriving employers of much needed engineering talent.

Consult Australia warns that the country’s current visa regime is starving the design and construction industries of engineering talent, and severely impeding future infrastructure development as a consequence.

Megan-Motto

Megan Motto, CEO Consult Australia

Megan Motto, CEO of Consult Australia, said that changes to outdated visa regulations are urgently needed given the critical role that skilled migration plays in supplying the country with qualified engineers.

“Robust skilled migration programs are essential to the health of engineering-based companies and the Australian economy as a whole,” said Motto.

In addition to “the high cost of doing business” in Australia, Motto pointed to “chronic workforce supply issues” arising from the cyclical nature of employment demand as one of the most besetting problems affecting the country’s infrastructure design sector.

Consult Australia is the peak industry body for consulting firms operating in the built and natural environment, with member companies including AECOM, Opus International Consultants, Parsons Brinckerhoff, and WorleyParsons.

Motto has called in particular for the government to make amendments to the 457 visa program, which she says singles out the employers of engineers for unfair treatment.

“Recently introduced Labour Market Testing (LMT) requirements that specifically target employers of engineers – but no other professionals – add administrative burdens to an industry that is already struggling” Motto said. “The 457 visa was intended as a means for filling positions that are in high demand and hard to fill – yet recent reforms have made doing that exponentially harder.”

The 457 visa has of late become a keen source of controversy for Australian workers on the opposite end of the employment equation. The Construction, Forestry Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) claimed in early April that the visas had been abused by Gina Rinehart’s $10 billion Roy Hill iron ore project to bring in up to 200 Korean workers to the Pilbara, where they had been forced to work in exploitative conditions.

Consult Australia has sought to assuage concerns about similar abuses by the employers of professional engineers, however, by submitting data attesting to industry compliance with the visa program.

 

 

 

 

Embed
FavoriteLoadingsave article

Comments

 characters available
*Please refer to our comment policy before submitting
Discussions
2
  1. antony fendt

    Whilst the 'shortage' of skilled labour might be the case in some instances, there is also a distinct reluctance on behalf of the infrastructure developers to recognise the skills adaptability of many erstwhile well qualified and experienced people who are effectively shut out by the very narrow band attributes 'required'. The reluctance to skill-focus local resources whilst importing others, who not only quire skill-focus but also adaptability to Australian conditions, is amusing in the extreme

  2. Rob

    Yep, let's just import technical professions, don't grow them here. The government can save a lot of money by doing so as they can then stop funding the universities, just like they recently did with the car industry. Shut it down and let the market decide things.
    A question for you all, as many politicians on both sides of politics are lawyers, do you thing they would allow large scale 457 visas from people originating from lower cost countries to flood the Australian the legal profession?