Australian Construction Apprenticeship System in Crisis: Report 4

By
Monday, September 1st, 2014
liked this article
Embed
Dulux Exsulite Construction – 300 x 250 (expire Dec 31 2016)
advertisement
construction apprentice
FavoriteLoadingsave article

The apprenticeship system within the Australian construction industry is in a state of crisis, according to a report prepared for the nation’s peak building union.

Written by University of Sydney Department of Political Economy Honorary Senior Research Fellow Phillip Toner for the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), the Weakened foundations: The crisis in apprenticeships and training in the Australian construction industry report  warns that the nation’s building sector faces emerging skills shortages.

The report states that the number of new apprentices starting out has slumped by 28 per cent over the past three years, while the ratio of apprentices to tradespeople is at its lowest level since 2003, at 12.4 per cent.

Toner says the problem has a number of causes, including public sector cuts to TAFE funding and structural changes which were seeing increasing numbers of self-employed people and very small firms operating within the industry along with an increasing push toward ‘short-termism’.

Toner says TAFE funding cuts of 33 per cent over the past decade had led to a 25 per cent reduction in class teaching time and a decline in training quality, which he said had also been worsened by a push toward higher proportions of the reduced funding to private operators, many of whom he said delivered poor quality training.

In addition, the government had also sought to shift the cost of training onto students through fee increases and replacement of the Tools For Your Trade Scheme with a less generous scheme of income contingent loans.

Moreover, Toner says, the withdrawal of the public sector as a major funder of construction work (the public funded share of construction work has fallen from 36 per cent in 1987 to 19 per cent now) and increasing reliance upon global capital markets to fund projects has driven ‘short-termism’ within the industry, has weakened the government’s traditional role in setting standards on training, health and safety and apprentices, and precipitated ‘risk-shifting’ toward smaller firms and self-employed contractors, many of whom were less likely to take on apprentices or invest in expensive equipment or research.

“Major ‘risk shifting’ in the industry has resulted in a proliferation of small firms and self-employed contractors” Toner said. “Such arrangements can be used to cut wages, other benefits, and workplace safety.”

“Yet this ’low road’ to profitability is constraining productivity and innovation in the industry. Small firms are less likely to take on apprentices, or invest in expensive equipment and research. And it contributes to the ‘chaos of the construction site’ where managing a large number of contractors, especially to improve quality and efficiency, is difficult.”

The report follows an overhaul of funding arrangements for apprentice support in this year’s Federal Budget, which saw a net of around $1 billion over four years slashed from skills programs overall through the scrapping of the Tools For Your Trade Program and 10 other programs that dealt with areas such as apprentice mentoring and English language proficiency in favour of a new program of apprentice support loans and the establishment of a new Industry Skills Fund.

That brought a mixed response from industry groups, who raised concerns about the abolition of what they saw as important programs such as the Workforce English Language program as well as the restrictive and narrow focus of the new fund.

Toner takes particular aim at the reduction in TAFE funding cuts and teaching hours, which in New South Wales has seen the number of class time hours students are being given from 36 weeks per year (one day per week) to 30 and which he says has led to employment of teachers with inadequate qualifications and experience as well as insufficient teaching materials and equipment.

He says this impacts the quality of training and volume of knowledge and skills that can be imparted during the course of an apprenticeship and limits the capacity of off-the-job training to introduce students to important areas of construction practice to which they are not commonly exposed in the course of their work.

“It is generally accepted that it is highly desirable that more of society’s resources be devoted to critical activities such as education and training,” Toner concluded. “It is unclear why VET is being treated in such a radically different manner to school education and the universities.”

Embed
FavoriteLoadingsave article

Comments

 characters available
*Please refer to our comment policy before submitting
Discussions
4
  1. TB

    This report must have been written very quickly, as many of the issues it raises are only recent changes. The cuts to WELL & Tools for trade only happening in the last few weeks. No evidence is given for the claim that private RTO's deliver lower quality training than TAFE's. In the next paragraph the writer talks about how TAFE has been forced to employ trainers with lower qualifications…so does that mean that TAFE is delivering lower quality training than private RTO's overnight? The myth that TAFE is the only way to go, ignores the fact that in many states TAFE has become a bloated bureaucracy, too slow to react to industry needs. No mention that trainers could be afforded if their management took cut backs.

  2. Lou Sarri

    The problem is the CFMEU they have made the cost of apprentices in their enterprise agreements too high , so contractors are reluctant to employ . Pre enterprise agreements employers we able to over employ their required number .

  3. Emanuel Lovriha

    As a medium sized business operator, I am very surprised to see no mention of the "actual" cause of the reduction in the number of apprenticeships.
    The increased remuneration entitlements for apprentices has basically made them non viable as an investment, instead opting for trades assistance or employing fully trained personnel.
    With the ever increasing costs of operating business in Australia, increasing the cost burden for training apprentices on business only has one outcome, and its now becoming apparent.

  4. Andrew Heaton Andrew Heaton

    Hi TB,

    In fairness to the report author, they did dedicate a whole chapter to the topic of training, so perhaps the brief summary mention this article gives about what the report says on private RTOs does not do justice to the level of attention the report author actually gave about this and perhaps gives the impression of a lack of evidence cited more so than what is actually in the full report.

    One of the challenges with news articles as opposed to 50 odd page reports does revolve around the need to summarise topics about which the report goes into greater depth, leading to the impression the report does not give as much evidence as it in fact has done. This is what happened in this case.