China Rebuff Leaves Billions in NSW Infrastructure Funding at Risk 2

Wednesday, August 17th, 2016
liked this article
ACIF 300×250
FavoriteLoadingsave article

The Federal government’s decision to scupper a bid from Chinese state-owned investors for majority control of one of Australia’s biggest power concerns could leave key NSW infrastructure projects fiscally stranded.

Beijing-controlled China State Grid and Hong Kong listed Cheung Kong Infrastructure planned to enter a $10 billion deal to obtain a 50.4 per cent stake in Ausgrid under a 99 year lease.

State-owned utility giant Ausgrid owns and oversees the electrical distribution networks that supply power to an estimated 1.6 million customers across Sydney and the NSW Central Coast. Ausgrid was formed in 2011 following the division and sale of EnergyAustralia, with both shares in the company held by the NSW government since the spin off.

Federal Treasurer Scott Morrison has since blocked the sale of half of Ausgrid’s business on the grounds of the national security risk created by the control of domestic power assets by overseas state-owned companies.

For the time being the scuppering of the sale leaves a huge hole in funding for the NSW government’s ambitious infrastructure plans. The Baird Government intends to spend as much as $73 billion on a slew of infrastructure projects over the next four years, including railway lines, freeways, hospitals and schools, with $20 billion in funding contingent upon the offloading of state assets.

NSW Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian has put a sanguine spin on things, pointing to interest in Ausgrid from multiple parties, and saying that she expects money for the transaction to be “banked in the next state budget.”

The state Labor opposition points out, however, that the Federal government’s decision to block the sale to cash-flush Chinese companies could mean that NSW will receive billions less for the Ausgrid sale, with some estimates pegging the shortfall at around $4 billion.

“(Baird’s) entire plan has been on selling Ausgrid to the highest bidder,” said opposition leader Luke Foley. “Inevitably this state will receive billions of dollars less than Mr Baird was counting on.”

Given the scale and expense of the NSW’s near-term infrastructure ambitions, the shortfall in funding created by Morrison’s intervention in the Ausgrid sale has the potential to jeopardise a number of key infrastructure projects, or lead to dramatic reductions in their scope.

$1.1 billion could be saved on the controversial WestConnex project by rescinding plans for tunnels in the inner west of Sydney as well as the proposed construction of a massive motorway junction. Proposed “smart motorway” improvements could also suffer, given their current estimated cost of in excess of $1 billion.

While the CBD and South East light rail are bound for completion and the proposed Parramatta light rail is already locked in, regional rail lines could suffer due to their low priority compared to urban transit development.


FavoriteLoadingsave article


 characters available
*Please refer to our comment policy before submitting
  1. Tom Green

    Let's put this in perspective, the above-mentioned sale would put critical infrastructure and assets in the hands of a foreign government which is massively building up its military spending and is becoming increasingly confrontational in the South-East China Sea. Whilst neither China nor the US actually wants war, we cannot deny that the potential for miscalculation and conflict to start is very real (and will be made even more real if Americans are silly enoug to put a lunatic in charge in November).

    If we were seriously asked to participate in any form of confrontation, does anyone seriously think that the Chinese would hesitate to shut down any part of our power grid which it owns? That would bring our economy to a standstill and have massive impacts for things such as our hospitals.

    Anyone who seriously suggests that enabling a foreign and potetentially hostile government to control critical national assets is not putting our national security at risk is deluding themselves, as is anyone who suggests that we should allow this just to put a few more dollars in the bank.

  2. Julie Ward

    Signing the free trade agreement with China was always going to put them in the drivers seat. Did we expect anything less from China and would we potentially trust that our country would not end up with the same pollution problems that china currently faces should we agree to a majority share in our energy companies? Wake up and smell the roses [while you still can] Australia. Take your head out of the sports page and consider your future and your children's future. We are at a turning point in our history – major countries interfering with our infrastructure, energy and god forbid our army. Where are our Australian standards when genuine Australians can no longer manufacture to a standard due to expense but places like China can bring substandard goods and workers into our country.