A world-first ‘flow model’ devised by Australian researchers could drastically slash public transport commuter times during peak periods on some of the busiest roads in major cities, new research shows.
When this flow model was implemented to improve the worst traffic bottlenecks across Melbourne, commuters saved close to 2000 hours of travel time during a single morning peak period (7am-9am) and approximately 11,000 hours of passenger travel time during a normal weekday.
Ameliorating major traffic bottlenecks also contributed to a more than 23 per cent improvement in reliability of Melbourne’s public transport network, on average, during weekdays and by up to 26 per cent on weekends.
Most bottlenecks were those that cut through the Melbourne central business district, yet links connecting suburban sites such as La Trobe and Monash universities, and Chadstone shopping centre to the metro train network were among the most critical bottlenecks in Melbourne’s transport network.
Research by Monash University and RMIT University, published in the prestigious international journal Nature Communications, introduced a novel flow model – built upon the so called Unaffected Demand (UD) concept – to examine the impact of road congestion on travelling passengers using the bus and tram networks.
A flow network is the mathematical model for any system with a network structure where connections are a means for carrying some kind of flow from one component to another.
Traffic and public transport systems can be perfectly modeled as complex networks where different entities (intersections or stops) are mapped to a set of components (or network nodes), and the means for transportation of flow demand between these locations are represented as connections between the nodes.
“Whether it be passengers in transport systems, or energy in power grids, the primary purpose of most critical infrastructures is to carry some kind of flow between different locations,” Professor Hai Vu, research co-author and Director of Monash University’s Institute of Transport Studies, said.
“The introduced concept of UD is our simple yet effective way of measuring this flow, as well as its significance, to determine the reliability of demand-serving networks and identifying the impact of congestion at any particular part of the network in the ‘big picture’.
“From our analysis we’ve identified the impact of mitigating congestion by any measure on a road segment – not only for passengers normally passing through that corridor, but also for all trips between different places that can potentially benefit from that decongested road as a new pathway.”
Research co-author and student in Monash University’s Faculty of Engineering, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, said the most effective solution to avoid bottlenecks is to allocate segregated lanes and give priority to public transport vehicles in those high impact locations.
“On the one hand, dedicating road spaces to bus and tram vehicles will significantly improve functionality of the public transport network and its quality of service which encourages its use, and on the other hand, this means less road space, which is very well known to be a discouraging factor for car use,” Mr Hamedmoghadam said.
The research team extracted the mobility demand of major cities from detailed transportation data and found that applying state-of-the-art theories from network science and physics can provide a different, yet more accurate, understanding of reliability and vulnerabilities of transport networks.
The real-world case studies in the paper tackles the problem of conflicting road congestion with passenger movements by on-road (bus and tram) public transport (PT) in both Melbourne and Brisbane.
Melbourne’s on-road public transport network was, at the time of collecting data in 2017, comprised of approximately 5500 nodes, 10,500 links, and a flow demand derived from part of 470,000 trips performed during a normal weekday. Brisbane had a relatively smaller network with approximately 1400 nodes and 3400 links on average on a regular weekday.
Associate Professor Mahdi Jalili from RMIT’s School of Engineering said the proposed model is capable of identifying vital bottlenecks of the network even if they are located at any corridor other than the major roads.
“The application of our framework to any urban road network leads to determination of roads where congestion, regardless of its extent, has a detrimental effect on the quality of travel over the network as a whole. Of course, major roads are pathways for more traffic and they are more prone to congestion compared to back streets,” Associate Professor Jalili said.
With the ever increasing availability of data and unprecedented advancements in scientific understanding of transportation systems, Professor Lewi Stone from RMIT’s School of Science says there is much to benefit from cutting-edge research in policy making, planning, and management in the area of transportation.
“By exploiting this information, our analysis becomes capable of revealing the vital bottlenecks of transport networks which evolve during a day but follow a pattern that repeats day to day,” he said.
“This means that we can identify adjustments required to fine-tune the network according to how passengers move throughout the day. We can also pinpoint problems in the network that hinder passenger movements at a certain time every day, like congestion bottlenecks of morning rush-hour.”
This study was a collaboration involving Homayoun Hamedmoghadam and Professor Hai Vu (Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University), and Associate Professor Mahdi Jalili and Professor Lewi Stone (RMIT University). To download a copy of the research paper, please visit https://rdcu.be/cfGMr or https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21483-y