Australian cities have some of the highest car parking costs in the world. Why is this, what can anything be done about it, and what might happen if it gets any worse?
It’s hard to fathom but the cost of parking a car for a day or even a couple of hours can apparently cost you more in an Australian CBD than downtown Manhattan, or London, or Paris. The latter are global centres of commerce, with populations that dwarf that of Australian cities. New York City’s 8.4 million residents are the almost the equivalent of our three major capitals – combined.
Manhattan Island alone has 1.6 million residents, plus it adds another 1.6 million commuters, every day, swelling daily to over 3 million people. By comparison, the City of Sydney (the CBD plus surrounds) is roughly equivalent in area to Manhattan Island but home to only around 190,000 residents and a daily influx of workers and students of around 450,000. Yet it can cost more to park in Sydney, or even smaller cousin Brisbane (under 200,000 employees in the inner city), than Manhattan.
Why is this the case?
On the supply side, there has been a history of anti-car planning culture in many Australian cities for some time. Sydney was the first to impose a parking tax on CBD car spaces, in a bid to force up the price of parking and divert people to public transport. It forced up the price all right, with a number of subsequent increases in the tax over the years (the tax is now around $2,000 per car space), but it made no real impact on public transit.
“The parking space levy is all about encouraging people to leave their car at home, and take public transport,” then-NSW Transport Minister David Campbell was quoted as saying by ABC News in 2009.
In the same story, it took someone from the Nature Conservation Council (the irony is delicious) to point out the bleeding obvious.
“I don’t think it will have too much of an impact on congestion,” said the organisation’s executive director Cate Faehrmann. “Any increase in parking levies probably isn’t going to make too much of a difference to the people who can afford it right now, what it will make a difference with I suppose is the people who really don’t have any other options and are currently driving in.”
Incredibly – and idiotically – the South Australian Government proposed the same thing for Adelaide last year, where a $750 per annum parking tax was proposed. You’d think they’d be desperate to bring any economic life they could find into Adelaide, but evidently if that economy arrives in a car, they don’t want it. Fortunately, the tax was blocked in the upper house, but you can bet the idea hasn’t been abandoned.
The punitive policy stance on CBD parking visits itself in other forms too. Restrictions on building new CBD parking spaces has had the effect of limiting supply as the cities grew. New multi-level basement or above ground parking stations could alleviate the supply-side problem, and there seem to be enough sites suited to them in most cities, but the policy stance doesn’t support them. Commercial towers can also be limited in terms of the numbers of additional basement spaces they can deliver into the casual pool, in a bid to limit the supply of additional parking.
This public policy view is connected to deeply held faith (and the operative word is ‘faith’ because there’s little evidence to support the view) that by pricing or policing private vehicles out of Australian CBDs, the same people would be forced to use public transport, and we’d all be better for it.
“We just need to get the cars out of the city,” is the sort of view you’ll hear often on talk back radio.
The problem is simple: if you take the cars out of the city, you’ll take the people too, and then the businesses will follow.
Bear in mind is that parking is not just about commuters. CBDs and inner cities are places for business to interact with other businesses, and with government. They also interact with customers, clients and suppliers. They have restaurants and retail shops that rely not just on the CBD worker but also visitors to the CBD, for the retail dollar. Many of these people invariably rely on the private vehicle to get there.
Casual parking costs – at up to $60 or even $70 for a couple of hours – have long passed the point where they’re a deterrent; they’re a real disincentive to visit the CBD for casual business meetings. Permanent parkers with paid company spaces won’t notice this, but they may begin to wonder at the number of meeting requests for out-of-centre meetings, where the parking cost isn’t 10 times the cost of the coffee.
If the intent is to ‘punish’ the private vehicle in the belief that this will encourage higher rates of public transit patronage, the irony is that the consequence could see more businesses relocate to outside city centres, where parking regimes are more favourable and occupancy costs lower. If that happens, the numbers of office workers for whom train and bus services are a convenient option will actually fall – because public transport options in non-central locations are notoriously difficult to service and often require mode or route changes for a single trip.
Centralised employment is what works for public transport so it ought to be in the interests of public transport advocates to support more CBD employment and more widely available parking (both in supply and pricing) than to argue for punitive agenda-based policy positions which may deter businesses from city centres. In short, if you succeed in chasing cars out of the inner city, you may also chase business out and end up with more private vehicle transit for work journeys than if they had stayed in the CBD.
On the demand side, we seem to have a limitless capacity to pay when it comes to parking that is allowing operators to charge what they do. However expensive the spaces may be, they do seem consistently full. Arguably, for many there is little choice. There is also little competition, with only a handful of operators seemingly controlling the market. But it is fair to question whether the exorbitant rates now being charged – especially for short term parking – won’t in time begin to change behaviour. If that behaviour begins to lead an exodus of activity to non-central locations, prices should fall as demand weakens, but that may create other, larger problems as suggested above.
So how should we deal with congestion and parking policy and public transport?
There is no easy answer here, but I’d suggest that reliance on proven failures like parking taxes or similar pricing policies in the Australian context is not a good option. It might be helpful instead to get a solid grasp on all the factors driving the high cost of parking – including oligopoly pricing by a small handful of operators.
We also need to understand clearly the benefits of city parking before treating it like a disease and trying to eradicate it, or the patient will suffer. And we also need to be very clear on what alternatives exist and the genuine likelihood and extent to which public transport can replace the private vehicle, given our urban scale.