New Zealand Plans to Add Tax on Foreigners Buying Homes 1

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2015
liked this article
property tax
FavoriteLoadingsave article

New Zealand’s Inland Revenue Department is proposing to introduce a resident withholding tax on foreign buyers of residential property from next July as part of the government’s plans to crack down on speculators.

The tax department is proposing to implement the tax, which would require an amount to be withheld on the sale of residential property, to support the introduction of the two-year “bright-line” test.

The test, once it comes into effect in October, will tax any investor capital gains on property that is sold within two years.

The IRD wants feedback on a consultation document, released on Monday, which proposes a withholding tax of 33 per cent of a vendor’s gain on a sale, or 10 per cent of the total purchase price, whichever is the lower.

Conveyancers and solicitors would act as the withholding agents.

“It can be more difficult to collect tax from people speculating on property in New Zealand if that seller lives overseas,” Revenue Minister Todd McClay said in a statement.

“For this reason, we are proposing that a portion of the sales proceeds are withheld at the time of sale and paid to Inland Revenue as a pre-payment or bond against any tax that may be due.”

The withholding tax was floated when the government unveiled plans to impose tighter policing of tax on property speculators in the May budget in response to growing fears about the pace of Auckland house price inflation.

Submissions on the paper close on October 2, and officials are particularly interested in who should have to actually withhold the tax and how the process would work in practice.


By Paul McBeth
FavoriteLoadingsave article


 characters available
*Please refer to our comment policy before submitting
  1. Julie Ward

    This could be something that could benefit Australia also since foreign investment in residential [especially luxury residential] is rising. There should be some kind of benefit to the country otherwise all the benefits go to the investor who then removes it out of the country. I also believe that it should not be longer than 2 years and not an automatic path to quick citizenship which overrides those that have entered through the correct laws and requirements.