Unregistered Builder Ordered to Pay $42,500 2

Tuesday, August 11th, 2015
liked this article
Dulux Exsulite Construction – 300 x 250 (expire Dec 31 2016)
FavoriteLoadingsave article

A recent case in Western Australian involving the performance of shoddy renovation work highlights the importance of employing registered builders.

An unregistered builder in Western Australia has been prosecuted by the state’s Building Commissioner for performing illegal home renovation work, after failing to pay compensation to the owners as ordered by the State Administration Tribunal.

Richard Jonathon Sheridan, a resident of the Vines in Perth’s Swan Valley region, performed a $250,000 renovation of a house in Scarborough during the second half of 2011 without the requisite building registrations.

In July Sheridan pleaded guilty before the Perth Magistrates Court to one charge each of contracting for and carrying out building work worth more than $20,000 without first obtaining the necessary registrations – actions which are deemed offences under the Building Services (Registration) Act 2011, as well as the repealed Builders Registration Act 1939. 

In addition to prosecution for the performance of building work while unregistered, Sheridan was also convicted for entering a non-complying cost-plus contract and failure to obtain home indemnity insurance for the building work – both of which are offences under the Home Building Contracts Act 1991.

As a directed result of these infractions Sheridan has sustained a loss of $42,500 – including a court-ordered fine of $10,000 and related costs of $2,500, as well as the payment of $30,000 in compensation to the owners of home which was renovated.

The home owners, who had poured their life savings into the renovation, dismissed Sheridan after finding his building work to be unsatisfactory, as well as submitted a complaint to the Building Commissioner.

The complaint was subsequently referred to the State Administrative Tribunal, which ordered Sheridan’s company, One Emperor Pty Ltd, to pay $52,755.50 to the owners in September 2012.

By the time One Emperor entered liquidation in October 2012 the compensation sum remained unpaid, while the absence of a policy of home indemnity insurance left the owners unable to claim the amount of the order from an insurance company.

According to Building Commissioner Peter Gow the case underlines the need for consumers to enlist registered builders for the projects worth more than $20,000.

“The registration system ensures that a person with the necessary qualifications, knowledge and experience is entitled to carry out work according to the appropriate standards,” said Gow.

“Consumers should protects themselves by engaging the services of a registered building service provider when required and knowing their rights and responsibilities before they enter into a home building work contract for building work.”


FavoriteLoadingsave article


 characters available
*Please refer to our comment policy before submitting
  1. beverley-jane

    Registration means nothing in Victoria. Our builder was registered and left us with more than $200 000 in damages to our brand new house! When he eventually liquidated more than 4 years later, there were multiple builders warranty insurance claims from other homeowners who were obviously hoodwinked into believing that registration equated to competence and honesty. I have since discovered that there were other successful claims against his work dating back to 1999 and 2006. Long track record and yet regulators offered ongoing registration which in my opinion is misleading and deceptive conduct on the part of registration bodies.

    • Russell. Jones.

      Hi. Everybody talks about bad builders and the govt. can't see any problem. The auditor general has reported the same thing several times and nothing is done. I have been to consumer affairs nothing done builder ignored there directions tried vcat builder ignored there judgment. building commision were a bigger joke than first two. Tried plumbing commission inspector called in looked called builder organised builder to be there do required work and stayed to make sure work was finished right. Now I will take the matter to court. Maybe if everybody who has a building problem asked the TAX dept for their Goods & Services TAX back something would be done. might not be as silly as it sounds. Russ Jones.